Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cindy Burger vs Suzan Lamens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Burger vs Lamens analysis and find out who is favored!
Cindy Burger vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Burger 2 - 0 Lamens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 45.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 57.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 54.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lamens winning 62.34% (W/L 48/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 283/ 180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 176/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Burger winning 2 times and Lamens being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Burger winning 4 and Lamens winning 2. The last match between Burger and Lamens was at the W15 Oldenzaal, 16-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Cindy Burger getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Burger and Lamens have played a deciding set 2 times, with Burger winning 2 times and Lamens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Burger winning 1, and Lamens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burger has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 224.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 49.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
134
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
140
Rank
131
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
59% (325-229)
Career Total W/L
58% (265-192)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
68% (26-12)
$44,173
Career Prize Money
$81,693
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Cindy Burger vs Suzan Lamens For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Burger VS Lamens
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Cindy Burger | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 18 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:54:0 | 2:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (117/212) | 53% (116/219) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (75/117) | 55% (64/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (34/95) | 45% (46/103) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (15/29) | 46% (13/28) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (109/219) | 49% (103/212) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Cindy Burger
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
12 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 4-6 7-5 7-6(3) |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Suzan Lamens
52%
(
60 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
72 of
129)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
11
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
39%
(
22 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
60 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
67 of
129)
123
Total Points Won
122
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cindy Burger | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (26/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (54/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (447/361) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (11/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 216.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1487/2414) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (942/1487) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (418/927) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (163/327) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (1181/2490) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (18/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (25/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 85% (11/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 38% (16/6) |
Cindy Burger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Cindy Burger
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sinja Kraus
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Cindy Burger
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Jesika Maleckova
43%
(
40 of
92)
1st Serve %
39%
(
30 of
76)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
12 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
34%
(
22 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
31%
(
13 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
52%
(
33 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Marine Partaud
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sina Herrmann
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Bente Spee
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Suzan Lamens
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Suzan Lamens
39%
(
17 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bernarda Pera
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
107)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Unknown Player
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Suzan Lamens
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Burger Vs Lamens Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Burger are available here and Lamens photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
